Tasha K Video
Her Channel channel “UnWine With Tasha K,” despite having over 1 million followers, is where she frequently posts videos. Kebe began her Channel career in August 2015, however, it is unknown what she did before that. As shown in a submitted verdict, Cardi was given an extra $2.8 million by the jury on Tuesday, January 25. This figure is based on her popular media debates and news web series. Based on the most recent Idol Net Worth, Kebe has had a market capitalization of $1.5 million since around January 2022. Following Monday and Tuesday’s jury announcements, Cardi’s cumulative compensation in the litigation was roughly $4 million, which would include $25,000 for medical bills as well as around $1.3 million for additional expenses.
What Did Tasha K Say About Cardi B Rapper?
My husband, attorneys, and I fought tooth and nail. I’d want to express my gratitude for their extended durations and restless nights. Kebe eventually acknowledged publishing misinformation but allegedly sought to retract his remark. After that, Cardi was granted $1.25 million to settle. Cardi testified on the evidence that the videos made her feel “suicidal” and therefore that “only a wicked person could do such sh**,” however according to Billboard. Cardi and Kebe both testified and remembered their stories of the claims both during and after the trial. It’s only going to get better from this one, winos “Announced its intention on Monday, Kebe responded to her 35,000 Followers on social media. According to the media website, jurors held Kebe responsible for defamatory, misuse of personal information by the false depiction, and deliberate aggravation of psychological trauma. On Monday, the jury decided in favor of Cardi B. The trial began on Jan. 10 in federal appeals court in Georgia, with both ladies testifying. In the next weeks, Kebe’s lawyers can appeal the judgment towards the judge. If he maintains the conviction, her lawyers can take it to an appellate court. Cardi B acknowledged that the recordings made her feel “suicidal,” and that “only a terrible person could do such sh–.” When questioned according to her representatives, Kebe originally claimed that she deliberately disseminated falsehoods about the artist, but she then sought to retract that assertion. In contrast to defamatory, the jury found Kebe guilty of breach of confidentiality by portraying him in a false light.
Δ
